Zgārcenia, psihologie şi patologie |
Bine ati venit ca musafir! ( Logare | Inregistrare )
Va invitam la dezbateri pe teme diverse, avand in centrul lor Omul. Domeniu umanist complex, relativ greu de surprins in ecuatii sau teorii unice, psihologia va fi si un pretext pentru a discuta despre emotii, minte si suflet.
Zgārcenia, psihologie şi patologie |
29 Aug 2007, 02:03 PM
Mesaj
#1
|
|
Domnitor Grup: Membri Mesaje: 4.959 Inscris: 9 August 05 Din: marginea viselor Forumist Nr.: 6.763 |
-------------------- *_*_*
Pierdut Ć®n Geometria UitÄrii CÄutĆ¢nd Ipote(nu)zele Fericirii - TrecÄtorul -X- https://exergy33.wordpress.com/ |
|
|
22 May 2011, 04:59 AM
Mesaj
#2
|
|
Domnitor Grup: Membri Mesaje: 4.959 Inscris: 9 August 05 Din: marginea viselor Forumist Nr.: 6.763 |
Am identificat 'grupul de cercetatori'. De fapt respectivul test, si altele complementare, au fost facute cu scopul de a identifica existenta unei asa numite gene a altruismului. http://scan.oxfordjournals.org/content/ear...can.nsq083.full De retinut concluziile studiului (chiar daca nu au legatura directa cu subiectul). QUOTE DISCUSSION
Prosocial behaviour is one of the prerequisites for the growth and prosperity of societies and is observable in many species besides primates (Zak and Knack, 2001). Evolutionary theories have been shown to be useful to explain non-selfish behaviours by introducing the terms 'inclusive fitness' and 'reciprocal altruism' (Hamilton, 1964; Trivers, 1971). It is known that there is great variability between and within societies in prosocial behaviour (Henrich et al., 2005). Especially, the latter one has been of scientific interest in humans because shared cultural background variables like norms and ethics of a given society cannot be the reason for such variability. Twin studies have disentangled genetic and environmental influences on prosocial behaviours indicating that ∼50% of the variance in altruism can be accounted by genetic effects (Rushton et al., 1986; Rushton, 2004). However, these heritability estimates were based on self-report data. The ecological validity of self-report data in science has often been questioned (Brewer, 2000). Experimental settings, where decision making has direct costs or benefits for the participants are likely to be superior in this respect. Neuroeconomics often makes use of monetary rewards to increase the ecological validity of human decision making, because money is the most potent generalized secondary reinforcer available. Despite the ongoing debate on how social decision making and altruism as a specific form of prosocial behaviour is assessed adequately, there are no studies available investigating the molecular genetic basis of altruism (although molecular genetic studies on prosocial behaviour assessed by economic games are reported in the literature). Acest topic a fost editat de exergy33: 22 May 2011, 05:01 AM -------------------- *_*_*
Pierdut Ć®n Geometria UitÄrii CÄutĆ¢nd Ipote(nu)zele Fericirii - TrecÄtorul -X- https://exergy33.wordpress.com/ |
|
|
Versiune Text-Only | Data este acum: 28 April 2024 - 11:50 PM |