HanuAncutei.com - ARTA de a conversa!
Haine Dama designer roman

Bine ati venit ca musafir! ( Logare | Inregistrare )

> Universul Credintei:

Mesajele cu caracter ateist sau care au ca scop denigrarea unei religii sunt interzise in cadrul acestui forum.

> Biblia Subiect De Modificare ?
francmason32
mesaj 7 Jan 2006, 04:40 PM
Mesaj #1


Vataf
***

Grup: Membri
Mesaje: 121
Inscris: 26 December 05
Forumist Nr.: 7.532



Cu greu a aceptat Biserica ideea ca Pamantul este rotund.
Acum, dupa numeroase descoperiri in privinta evolutionismului, modificam Geneza.
Este Cartea Cartilor detinatoarea adevarului Absolut sau interpretarea data pana acum este gresita?
Motivul intrebari este articolul urmator.

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,13...1811332,00.html
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
 
Start new topic
Raspunsuri
francmason32
mesaj 8 Jan 2006, 06:17 AM
Mesaj #2


Vataf
***

Grup: Membri
Mesaje: 121
Inscris: 26 December 05
Forumist Nr.: 7.532



QUOTE (mărăcine @ 7 Jan 2006, 05:48 PM)

Eu nu cred ca Biblia este autoritatea unica, si nici cea absoluta, in ce priveste viata spirituala. Dar este compusa totusi din scrieri inspirate, si daca declari neadevarat ceea ce nu poti sa crezi din continutul ei, nu faci decat o improvizatie...

Atunci incearca, te rog , sa ma faci sa inteleg urmatorul aspect:

"Nothing thrills the anti-Mason as much as Pike's references to Lucifer. Most Christians reading this will immediately recognize Lucifer as the fallen angel, as Satan, the ruler of hell. Why then, does Pike express his surprise in the words "Lucifer, the light-bearer! Strange and mysterious name to give to the Spirit of Darkness! Lucifer, the Son of the Morning! Is it he who bears the Light, and with its intolerable light blinds feeble, sensual or selfish souls?" He is upset, referring at one point to "the false Lucifer of the legend." What false legend?"

"I set out to learn for myself, and what I learned may upset many Christians, who have to be told that the King James version of the Bible, which they revere as the literal, precise, correct work of God, is not always so. Some of the error in it was quite deliberate, including the biblical designation of Lucifer as Satan, along with the concordant story of a fallen angel. It is difficult to anticipate the reactions of some believers on being told that there are gross mistakes in the King James version, but, please, do not throw this book across the room in disgust until you have read a bit more."

"Lucifer makes his appearance in the fourteenth chapter of the Old Testament book of Isaiah, at the twelfth verse, and nowhere else: "How art thou fallen from heaven, O Lucifer, son of the morning! How art thou cut down to the ground, which didst weaken the nations!""

"The first problem is that Lucifer is a Latin name. So how did it find its way into a Hebrew manuscript, written before there was a Roman language? To find the answer, I consulted a scholar at the library of the Hebrew Union College in Cincinnati. What Hebrew name, I asked, was Satan given in this chapter of Isaiah, which describes the angel who fell to become the ruler of hell? The answer was a surprise. In the original Hebrew text, the fourteenth chapter of Isaiah is not about a fallen angel, but about a fallen Babylonian king, who during his lifetime had persecuted the children of Israel. It contains no mention of Satan, either by name or reference. The Hebrew scholar could only speculate that some early Christian scribes, writing in the Latin tongue used by the Church, had decided for themselves that they wanted the story to be about a fallen angel, a creature not even mentioned in the original Hebrew text, and to whom they gave the name "Lucifer.""

"Why Lucifer? In Roman astronomy, Lucifer was the name given to the morning star (the star we now know by another Roman name, Venus). The morning star appears in the heavens just before dawn, heralding the rising sun. The name derives from the Latin term lucem ferre, "bringer, or bearer, of light." In the Hebrew text the expression used to describe the Babylonian king before his death is Helal, son of Shahar, which can best be translated as "Day star, son of the Dawn." The name evokes the golden glitter of a proud king's dress and court (much as his personal splendor earned for King Louis XIV of France the appellation, "The Sun King")."

"The scholars authorized by the militantly Catholic King James I to translate the Bible into current English did not use the original Hebrew texts, but used versions translated from the Catholic Vulgate Bible produced largely by St. Jerome in the fourth century. Jerome had mistranslated the Hebraic metaphor, "Day star, son of the Dawn," as "Lucifer," and over the centuries a metamorphosis took place. Lucifer the morning star became a disobedient angel, cast out of heaven to rule eternally in hell. Theologians, writers, and poets interwove the myth with the doctrine of the Fall, and in Christian tradition Lucifer is now the same as Satan, the Devil, and - ironically- the Prince of Darkness."

"So "Lucifer" is nothing more than an ancient Latin name for the morning star, the bringer of light. That can be confusing for Christians who identify Christ himself as the morning star, a term used as a central theme in many Christian sermons. Jesus refers to himself as the morning star in Revelation 22:16: "I Jesus have sent mine angel to testify unto you these things in the churches. I am the root and the offspring of David, and the bright and morning star.""

"And so there are those who do not read beyond the King James version of the Bible, who say "Lucifer is Satan: so says the Word of God," while others with knowledge of the Latin and Hebrew texts say, "No, Lucifer is the classical Roman name for the morning star, and now Jesus is the morning star." This discussion can only anger certain fundamentalists. (I have at hand an evangelical tract from a Baptist church that says, "I believe in the Infallibility and Preservation of God's Word, of which the King James 1611 authorized version is the God-guided faithful translation.")"

"Fortunately, this issue of errors in biblical translations is not one that we have to struggle with ourselves. Generations of biblical scholars of all faiths have been aware of the mistranslations and of the misunderstandings that arise from the use of archaic terms whose meanings have been lost, or have evolved into different usages. To address these problems a conference was held in October 1946, attended by delegates of the Church of England, the Church of Scotland, and the Baptists, Methodists, and Congregationalist churches. At another meeting four months later, delegates from the Presbyterians and Quakers joined the original group, along with representatives of various Bible societies. Still later, observers were sent as representatives of the Roman Catholic Church."

"The work on a new translation of the Bible, direct from the sources, stretched out over several years. The most distinguished biblical scholars and specialists in the world were invited to contribute, and every delegate was given the opportunity to review and express his own views on every verse, every word, as presented by the translators."

"The result of this prodigious joint effort was The New English Bible, of which the New Testament was published in 1969 and the Old Testament one year later."

"That does not mean that I have cast aside my King James version: I have them both. But I must recognize that while God may be the inspirational source of all the Old and New Testament scriptures, He is certainly not responsible for the imperfect translations from the language of the earliest surviving texts. To err is human, and men can become overzealous because of the emotional aspects of the subject."

"To the point, the verse in the King James version (Isaiah 14:12) that begins "How art thou fallen from heaven, 0 Lucifer..." has now been translated directly from the Hebrew in the New English Biible as "How you have fallen from heaven, bright morning star..." There is no mention of Lucifer, no reference to any disobedient angel plunging to hell, nor should there be."

"The emphasis here should be on intent. When Albert Pike and other Masonic scholars spoke over a century ago about the "Luciferian path," or the "energies of Lucifer," they were referring to the morning star, the light bearer, the search for light; the very antithesis of dark, satanic evil.

PS In versiunea romana a bibliei (ortodoxa) nu exista nici un fel de mentiune a numelui Lucifer, de unde deduc, logic, ca folosirea termenului, de catre clerul roman, este doar o preluare nefundamentata a termenului.
http://www.razboiulnevazut.org/biblia/

BIBLIA ORTODOXĂ căutare | descarca | contact

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Rezultate căutare [?]
S-a cautat: lucifer

S-au găsit 0 versete.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Înapoi la căutare

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Cum se face cautarea?
Se caută în cărţile alese versetele care conţin toate cuvintele introduse. Se ţine seama de diacritice, dar nu de majuscule.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Biblia Online este un proiect OrtodoXronet
Sponsor RNV: Romanul Canadian
www.razboiulnevazut.org • razboiulnevazut@yahoo.com

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
razboiul nevazut | portal ortodox | forum ortodox | avort | biblia

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Powered by Gigel Chiazna



Acest topic a fost editat de francmason32: 8 Jan 2006, 06:26 AM
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Mesaje in acest topic
francmason32   Biblia Subiect De Modificare ?   7 Jan 2006, 04:40 PM
Bolt   Pai biserica e una (o adunare de oameni cu-n crez ...   7 Jan 2006, 05:48 PM
mărăcine   Citind articolul am avut senzatia ca e un evenimen...   7 Jan 2006, 05:48 PM
thunder   QUOTE (francmason32 @ 7 Jan 2006, 05:40 PM)Cu...   8 Jan 2006, 02:57 AM
axel   QUOTE (thunder @ 8 Jan 2006, 03:57 AM) QUOTE (fran...   8 Jan 2006, 03:27 AM
Octavi   QUOTE Pai biserica e una (o adunare de oameni cu-n...   8 Jan 2006, 03:30 AM
runik88   In sfarsit..de cand asteptam...sa se termine odata...   8 Jan 2006, 03:44 AM
Octavi   QUOTE PS. La fel de greu accepta si masoneria ca p...   8 Jan 2006, 03:47 AM
francmason32   QUOTE (runik88 @ 8 Jan 2006, 03:44 AM) In sfarsit....   8 Jan 2006, 05:15 AM
Cla   QUOTE (thunder @ 8 Jan 2006, 01:57 AM)- cum l...   8 Jan 2006, 05:29 AM
francmason32   QUOTE (mărăcine @ 7 Jan 2006, 05:48...   8 Jan 2006, 06:17 AM
francmason32   QUOTE (thunder @ 8 Jan 2006, 02:57 AM) - cum la fe...   8 Jan 2006, 06:23 AM
Cla   QUOTE (francmason32 @ 8 Jan 2006, 05:23 AM) A...   8 Jan 2006, 07:07 AM
ASD   QUOTE Cu greu a aceptat Biserica ideea ca Pamantul...   8 Jan 2006, 08:41 AM
ASD   CONCLUZIA: Biblia vorbeste despre lumea aceasta d...   8 Jan 2006, 09:16 AM
mărăcine   francmason32: In articolul citat de tine la incepu...   8 Jan 2006, 11:01 AM
thunder   QUOTE (axel @ 8 Jan 2006, 04:27 AM)QUOTE (thu...   8 Jan 2006, 04:12 PM
thunder   QUOTE QUOTE (Octavi @ 8 Jan 2006, 04:47 AM)QU...   8 Jan 2006, 04:23 PM
thunder   QUOTE (Cla @ 8 Jan 2006, 06:29 AM)QUOTE (thun...   8 Jan 2006, 04:45 PM
axel   QUOTE (thunder @ 8 Jan 2006, 05:12 PM) QUOTE (axel...   8 Jan 2006, 07:45 PM
thunder   QUOTE (axel @ 8 Jan 2006, 08:45 PM)QUOTE (thu...   8 Jan 2006, 09:08 PM
Clopotel   Dragii mei colegi, Va rog sa reveniti ontopic, si ...   8 Jan 2006, 11:00 PM
francmason32   QUOTE (thunder @ 8 Jan 2006, 09:08 PM) Au fos...   9 Jan 2006, 01:53 AM
bdl   Thunder, Ai contra-argumente la articolul pus de f...   9 Jan 2006, 02:01 AM
abureala   QUOTE 18. Si eu marturisesc oricui asculta cuvint...   9 Jan 2006, 10:10 AM
1,618033   Copii, sunt foarte ocupat la serviciu. Deci va ro...   9 Jan 2006, 10:23 AM
Octavi   ASD, ideea modificarii Bibliei a aparut, banuiesc,...   11 Jan 2006, 03:22 AM
Bolt   @octavi : QUOTE Biblia evreiasca (originalul) nu ...   11 Jan 2006, 10:29 PM
Octavi   QUOTE @octavi : QUOTE Biblia evreiasca (originalu...   13 Jan 2006, 12:22 AM
francmason32   QUOTE (Bolt @ 11 Jan 2006, 10:29 PM) @octavi ...   13 Jan 2006, 02:42 AM
abureala   QUOTE (Octavi @ 13 Jan 2006, 01:22 AM) Tot ea, pri...   13 Jan 2006, 11:04 AM
bdl   Abureala, Din pacate biblia are in ea principii co...   13 Jan 2006, 01:06 PM
Artanis   Interesant punct de vedere, deci Biblia a imprumut...   13 Jan 2006, 02:58 PM
actionmedia   QUOTE (Artanis @ 13 Jan 2006, 02:58 PM) Interesant...   13 Jan 2006, 03:39 PM
Artanis   Daca zice actionmedia ca "vede" inseamna...   13 Jan 2006, 03:51 PM
abureala   QUOTE (bdl @ 13 Jan 2006, 02:06 PM) Abureala, Din ...   13 Jan 2006, 04:04 PM
mărăcine   Cred ca e vorba de asemanari de genul: "Isi v...   13 Jan 2006, 04:16 PM
actionmedia   QUOTE (mărăcine @ 13 Jan 2006, 04:16 PM)...   13 Jan 2006, 04:32 PM
abureala   QUOTE (mărăcine @ 13 Jan 2006, 05:16 PM)...   13 Jan 2006, 04:45 PM
actionmedia   QUOTE (abureala @ 13 Jan 2006, 04:45 PM) Este o di...   13 Jan 2006, 04:59 PM
Leonardo   Biblia subiect de modificare: nu cred ca e cazul ...   13 Jan 2006, 05:04 PM
andra_v   QUOTE(Leonardo @ 13 Jan 2006, 06:04 PM) B...   9 Dec 2008, 11:45 PM
actionmedia   Daca privim biblia ca pe o colectie de informatii ...   13 Jan 2006, 05:29 PM
abureala   Eu cred ca trebuie sa facem altceva. Sa scoatem ge...   13 Jan 2006, 05:30 PM
Artanis   QUOTE Inteleg ca crestinismul este o religie dar c...   13 Jan 2006, 05:36 PM
actionmedia   QUOTE (Artanis @ 13 Jan 2006, 05:36 PM) QUOTE...   13 Jan 2006, 05:41 PM
abis   QUOTE (Artanis @ 13 Jan 2006, 05:36 PM) Eu nu...   13 Jan 2006, 05:50 PM
abureala   QUOTE (abis @ 13 Jan 2006, 06:50 PM) QUOTE (Artani...   13 Jan 2006, 06:05 PM
abis   QUOTE (abureala @ 13 Jan 2006, 06:05 PM) Daca ti t...   13 Jan 2006, 06:07 PM
Artanis   QUOTE (abis @ 13 Jan 2006, 05:50 PM) QUOTE (Artani...   13 Jan 2006, 06:09 PM
abureala   QUOTE (abis @ 13 Jan 2006, 07:07 PM) QUOTE (a...   13 Jan 2006, 06:13 PM
Artanis   Ei, hai nu exagera, rusii nu au demolat toate bise...   13 Jan 2006, 06:16 PM
abis   QUOTE (abureala @ 13 Jan 2006, 06:13 PM) Dar comun...   13 Jan 2006, 06:19 PM
abureala   QUOTE (abis @ 13 Jan 2006, 07:19 PM) QUOTE (aburea...   13 Jan 2006, 06:29 PM
Leonardo   revenind la intrebarea din titlu eu cred ca singur...   13 Jan 2006, 06:36 PM
axel   QUOTE (abureala @ 13 Jan 2006, 07:13 PM) Dar ca pe...   13 Jan 2006, 06:42 PM
francmason32   QUOTE (Leonardo @ 13 Jan 2006, 05:04 PM) Biblia su...   14 Jan 2006, 02:21 AM
francmason32   QUOTE (abis @ 13 Jan 2006, 05:50 PM) [QUOTE=Artani...   14 Jan 2006, 02:26 AM
francmason32   QUOTE (Leonardo @ 13 Jan 2006, 06:36 PM) revenind ...   14 Jan 2006, 02:35 AM
mărăcine   QUOTE (actionmedia)QUOTE (mărăcine ...   14 Jan 2006, 12:12 PM
roua   O intrebare ale caror raspunsuri sunt mereu ascuns...   14 Jan 2006, 03:25 PM
Bolt   @roua : QUOTE oricum sunt interesante evangheliile...   14 Jan 2006, 03:55 PM
francmason32   QUOTE (Bolt @ 14 Jan 2006, 03:55 PM) Iti spun eu ...   14 Jan 2006, 05:35 PM
Bolt   @francmason32 : QUOTE Evangheliile apocrife exista...   14 Jan 2006, 07:44 PM
francmason32   Arunca un ochi, te rog, Dl Bolt. http://www.arheot...   15 Jan 2006, 03:22 AM
Bolt   Deci ?   15 Jan 2006, 11:19 AM
abureala   QUOTE (francmason32 @ 15 Jan 2006, 04:22 AM) Arunc...   16 Jan 2006, 10:26 AM
Leonardo   QUOTE Unii le considera adevaruri si intamplari in...   16 Jan 2006, 12:09 PM
actionmedia   QUOTE (Leonardo @ 16 Jan 2006, 12:09 PM) Nu cred c...   16 Jan 2006, 12:33 PM
Bolt   @actionmedia : QUOTE Doar daca acea varianta initi...   17 Jan 2006, 08:32 AM
ASD   Nu vad ce legatura are comunismul cu Biblia...   17 Jan 2006, 08:49 AM
Bolt   ???   17 Jan 2006, 08:54 AM
abureala   QUOTE (francmason32 @ 15 Jan 2006, 04:22 AM) Arunc...   17 Jan 2006, 10:25 AM
abureala   QUOTE (francmason32 @ 7 Jan 2006, 05:40 PM) C...   17 Jan 2006, 10:45 AM
March   Da, iata cum a incercat un Baphomet : sa-l fa...   7 Aug 2006, 05:52 PM
Baradux   Articolul asta ma face sa ma gandesc la etichetele...   7 Aug 2006, 07:31 PM
mariusc2   Ar trebui sa mai bage in biblie si momente domesti...   8 Aug 2006, 09:01 PM
abureala   QUOTE (mariusc2 @ 8 Aug 2006, 11:01 PM) Ar trebui ...   9 Aug 2006, 12:46 PM
axel   RE: Biblia Subiect De Modificare ?   31 Jul 2007, 02:24 AM
andra_v   Cu alte cuvinte, aviz amatorilor: a nu se interpre...   31 Jul 2007, 06:23 PM
andra_v   Teoria Big Bang-ului contrazice dogmele ortodoxe? ...   9 Mar 2009, 12:56 PM
Marduk   Pentru cei interesati de acest capitol a fost pus ...   28 Sep 2011, 12:02 PM
exergy33   QUOTE(Marduk @ 28 Sep 2011, 01:02 PM) Pen...   29 Sep 2011, 11:58 AM
abis   Despre modificarile prin care a trecut biblia, urm...   28 Sep 2011, 12:11 PM
Marduk   Poti cumpara si cartea tradusa in romaneste.   28 Sep 2011, 02:12 PM
abis   Da, dar nu pot pune link   28 Sep 2011, 02:15 PM
Marduk   In cartea "Rastalmacindu-l pe Isus" este...   28 Sep 2011, 02:30 PM
March   De abia acum dau ochii cu acest topic . Biblia se ...   28 Sep 2011, 03:25 PM
abis   QUOTE(March @ 28 Sep 2011, 04:25 PM) Bibl...   28 Sep 2011, 04:30 PM
Marduk   Niciodata nu este prea tarziu, eu tot invat de-o v...   28 Sep 2011, 03:47 PM
Marduk   Un cuvant ici altul dincolo, greseli care devin re...   29 Sep 2011, 11:24 AM
Marduk   La mine merge, daca esti in Iran e posibil sa nu f...   29 Sep 2011, 12:07 PM
March   QUOTE(Marduk @ 29 Sep 2011, 01:07 PM) La ...   29 Sep 2011, 03:29 PM
exergy33   Nu-i vina lui Google. Posesorii site-ului imi bloc...   29 Sep 2011, 12:14 PM
The Dude   Exista, dupa cunostintele mele, cel putin patru va...   29 Sep 2011, 06:50 PM
Cucu Mucu   QUOTE(The Dude @ 29 Sep 2011, 07:50 PM) E...   29 Sep 2011, 07:06 PM
abis   QUOTE(The Dude @ 29 Sep 2011, 07:50 PM) E...   30 Sep 2011, 09:31 AM
The Dude   Nu unul foarte mare...dupa cum eu nu ii dau nici m...   30 Sep 2011, 10:00 AM
Marduk   QUOTE(abis @ 30 Sep 2011, 10:31 AM) In co...   30 Sep 2011, 10:22 AM
abis   Tocmai, Marduk - crezi intr-un text despre care st...   30 Sep 2011, 10:35 AM
2 Pagini V   1 2 >


Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Versiune Text-Only Data este acum: 5 May 2024 - 02:09 AM
Ceaiuri Medicinale Haine Dama Designer Roman