Julian Assange Si Wikileaks, Dezvaluiri incomode in era Internetului Optiuni

[Marduk]

De ceva timp urmaresc activitatea acestui om, Julian Assange, poate nici nu-l cheama asa poate ca este doar o facatura a servicilor secrete menit sa testeze reactia oamenilor la aflarea realitatii, a ipocriziei cu care este imbracata politica mondiala, fata de activitatea reala sferelor de influenta si putere de pe aceasta planeta. Julian Assange terorist sau luptator al adevarului? Dezvaluirile de pe site-ul WikiLeaks au dat de lucru ziarelor si serviciilor secrete, a bulversat o lume intreaga si a dovedit cat de puternica este arma informatiei in era Internetului. Nu stiu cat de reale sau adevarate sunt aceste informatii dar cert este ca ele au atins niste puncte sensibile pe care cei vizati le-au tratat diferit functie de interesele fiecaruia. Medvedev a declarat parca pentru a apara oarecum pozitia americanilor, ceva de genul ca daca s-ar vedea ce zic rusii despre americani!! alti politicienii par impacati cu aceste scurgeri de informatii, mai ales dupa ce a mai scazut din interesul publicului fata de adevarul banuit dar nepublicat al "relatiilor" si "vocabularului" folosit de politicienii americani si nu numai, in afara intalnirilor oficiale, protocolare, pline de zambete si politeturi. Ceva insa i-a speriat pe americani si pe toti ceilalti conducatori ai acestei lumi, vulnerabilitatea sistemului, posibilitatea ca plebea sa ajunga la niste informatii iritante care pot genera miscari sociale, revolte, etc. E ca si cum biblioteca Vaticanului ar fi fost scoasa din beciurile sale iar omenirea ar fi aflat ca Dumnezeu nu exista si ca totul este o inscenare, o fantezie, un teatru menit sa mentina status quo-ul actualei societati umane. Odata dezvaluirile facute a inceput teroarea asupra lui Julian Assange, probabil ca se astepta la o reactie dura din partea celor care s-au simtit deodata goi in fata multimii, sa vedem daca masurile sale il vor feri de razbunarea celor care conduc lumea ca pe propria mosie de sclavi. Dar poate ca lumea nici nu ar putea sa fie condusa altfel, poate ca acest animal, societatea umana, nu poate fi condus altfel decat prin teama, minciuna, scenarii, ura, crima, ipocrizie, poate ca in fond aceasta este natura umana iar cei care conduc exploateaza tocmai aceste caracteristici in favoarea lor. Astept parerile voastre despre acest subiect interesant cu un final ce mie imi pare cunoscut. Un lucru este cert, vor spori astfel de actiuni ale unor oameni ce se considera nedreptatiti de putere iar puterea va lua masuri ca astfel de lucruri sa nu se mai repete, este oare Internetul pregatit pentru o revolutie?

[turbo trabant]

"necrologul" lui assange facut de un dujman de al lui bush:

Yet in one sense Assange is the anti-anti-Bush.

Bush was criticized for unilateralist tendencies, for failing to nurture good relations with other nations — and, in particular, for writing off suspect nations (see “axis of evil”) as barely worth talking to at all. Obama came into office vowing “engagement.” He would reach out to other nations, emphatically including those with whom relations were most fraught, like Russia and Muslim nations, even including Iran.

If our government quit keeping explosive secrets about what it’s doing abroad, then what it’s doing abroad would change.
Engagement is the search for win-win outcomes to non-zero-sum games. As any game theorist can tell you, a key to reaching those outcomes is communication, and the communication is most fruitful when there is mutual trust. Well, thanks to Assange, many nations will now hesitate to speak candidly with us, fearing that their private utterances might go public.

Communication, and trust, may also be cooled by our recently revealed appraisals of foreign leaders. I’m guessing the Turks won’t warm to the cable from Ankara that looked forward to a day when “we will no longer have to deal with the current cast of [Turkish] political leaders, with their special yen for destructive drama and rhetoric.” And Vladimir Putin can’t be liking our depiction of him as a slacker thug.

Many of our foreign relations will prove resilient. Longstanding European allies will get over the insults, and will eventually accept assurances that we’re tightening the security of our missives. But such ready rapprochement is less likely with the Russias and Turkeys of the world — nations that are more culturally remote from us and were less secure in our friendship to begin with. In other words, the relationships that will suffer the deepest damage are the most fragile ones, the ones that Obama entered office hoping to mend with engagement.

These include many of the relationships that the neoconservatives who shaped Bush’s foreign policy were most willing to risk. Neocons have often encouraged policies and utterances that threatened relations with Russia and Turkey, as well as China, Iran and so on. Indeed, neoconservatism sometimes seems devoted to exacerbating the world’s major geopolitical fault lines. And now WikiLeaks has advanced the exacerbation. Maybe Assange, when he has time for some fresh conspiracy theorizing, can look into the possibility that neocons have implanted electrodes in his brain.

From where I stand — a position of emphatic anti-Bushism — this is a pretty serious charge: aiding and abetting anti-anti-Bushism.


he he mintile incurcate nu le mai descurca nimeni